Re: wire vs wired

["Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx>]

Make that innocuous, not innoculous

Doug L

--

"Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XFaHf.13586$eR.6428@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> RLBs fragile ego won't allow him to filter anyone, he will ignore, but not
> filter
> someone until he thinks he can score a point against them and then he will
> respond.
>
> On a side note I claim the dubious honour of being the first person in
> this
> group that RLB claimed to have filtered back in 1998  what a hoot.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/9e9cd623ea15597d?dmode=source&hl=en
>
> and the fairly innoculous post that provoked it
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/34695b6192e03f55?dmode=source&hl=en
>
> Doug L
>
>
>
>
> "Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8%8Hf.2276$Ly6.365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You got to be kidding me! You would just give out someones phone number
>> to
>> anyone on the net. I think he email would do just fine. Do you know
>> anything
>> about this person. What if Jim has a problem with this? And you have
>> access
>> to peoples credit card numbers? I can see it now after a few brief emails
>> with someone on the net, "Wow, you seem to be a great guy, here are a
>> couple
>> of credit card numbers on me".  To everyone else, I know RLB has me
>> filtered, so please pass along. Maybe if he receives it 15 or 20 times,
>> he
>> will get the message. Thanks!
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>