[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Florida Statute According to RLB

Subject: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
From: shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net (Si Ballenger)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:37:17 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <b_Xih.5000$AY1.4041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <458c7633.865104578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xkijh.5428$AY1.386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <458e1e8b.1095468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pctjh.9981$cB6.3900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:08:37 -0500, "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote:

>Opinions and codes change, laws change, statutes change.  Read the 2006
>statutes not 2003.  2003 no longer applies

Post the links to the applicable statutes that were changed in
2006 and I'll see if there is a significant difference from the
old ones. In the past posters were basing their post on their own
"fanticy thinking" and not what was actually written in the
statutes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Don

References:
- Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Si Ballenger
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Don
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Si Ballenger
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Don

Prev by Message: An Engineer's Analysis of Santa Claus
Next by Message: An Engineer's Analysis of Santa Claus- REBUTTAL
Previous by thread: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
Next by thread: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home