[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Florida Statute According to RLB

Subject: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
From: "Don" <don@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:46:21 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <b_Xih.5000$AY1.4041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <458c7633.865104578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:458c7633.865104578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yada, yada, yada... This debate has been going on for years. I
> looked at the Florida statutes a couple of years back to see what
> the deal is.


I hope you're not using old code books too if you're 'in the trade'?  You
might get a suprise.  Times change, it's soon to be 2007.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Si Ballenger

References:
- Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
  - From: Si Ballenger

Prev by Message: Re: Old Motion Detector
Next by Message: PC Anti Theft Tracking Software
Previous by thread: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
Next by thread: Re: Florida Statute According to RLB
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home