Re: DSC PC3000 Lockout

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I snapped rolled the UFO I borrowed from an ET. Does that count?


"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2bLfh.472347$5R2.9845@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Robert L Bass wrote:
>
>> That's not the point, Roland.  Olson has been lying for years, claiming
>> he does all sorts of installations.  He's not even an installer.  There
>> are three major distributors in Burnaby.  Olson says he's been installing
>> there for years yet none of them
>
> You're losing it, Robbie.  Can't even finish your sentences.  Let me
> explain (once again) for your benefit (since you're quite obviously an
> idiot).  Not a single person here knows me as "Olson".  The explanation
> for this is really quite simple.  You figure everyone that posts here with
> a "username" is using the one he's known by in the industry??  Have I got
> news for you.
>
>
>>
>> He also told us he snap-rolled a brand new 737 (something which is
>> physically impossible)
>
> Nope.  I never said that.  I've never snap rolled anything other than a
> Citabria, a C-150 Aerobat, and a Pitts Special.
>
>
>> after borrowing it from Boeing (something Boeing has never done)
>
> Never said that either.  Geeze you're a LIAR, aintcha?
>
>
>> to test his theory about how another airplane crashed.  In that
>> ridiculous story, Olson originally claimed that the plan was to deploy
>> reverse thrusters at altitude.  He backed off on that one when I informed
>> hiom there's an interlock which prevents the thrusters from engaging
>> unless there's weight on the mains (ie, the plane is on the ground).
>
> Nope.  Never did that either.  And you can override the reversers *in
> flight*.  What I said was that we couldn't deploy them in flight because
> of the risk of structural damage.  We elected to "simulate" the reverser
> depolying by applying a generous amount of left rudder instead.
>
>
>>
>> Olson has repeatedly lied about me,
>
> Where have I ever "lied about you"?  Show me just one post to back your
> claim.
>
>
>> about my business,
>
> Proof, Bass, Proof!
>
>
>> about phone conversations he says we had, etc.
>
> I've only ever had *one* telephone conversation with you.
>
>
>> He has also spent *most* of his online substitute for a life attacking me
>> in this and other newsgroups.  I feel it is my responsibility to make
>> certain others here aren't taken in by his bullfrank.
>
>
> Really?  The foremost LIAR in Usenet accuses someone else of being a liar.
> Prove it, Bass.  Put up or shut up.