[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: FCI 7100

Subject: Re: FCI 7100
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 05:05:32 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <LTDTe.7452$4i6.2707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lueuh1dltrbfjm3no5rsn000kpvjqd7jpe@xxxxxxx> <feydnYGN3JyHHYLeRVn-pA@xxxxxxxxxx> <Xns96CB6C639E58makusafemsncom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <nsPTe.349$3B2.24@trnddc02>

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nsPTe.349$3B2.24@xxxxxxxxxxx
> How the hell does FCI get away with this?  Any other manufacturer would
> probably lose their UL Listing for lesser reasons.
>
> Though I am not an FCI dealer...we weren't too far off from what the
> gentleman described his problems were. If you are correct, then the
> manufacturer is totally responsible, and should overnight a new panel to
> remedy the situation quickly. If they fail to comply, contact UL and
> document everything.
>
> Jim Rojas


What's UL gonna do??  By the time the "wheels" get in motion there, the
building will be scheduled for demolition to make room for the new space
port.

References:
- FCI 7100
  - From: Richard Merriam
- Re: FCI 7100
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: FCI 7100
  - From: mikey
- Re: FCI 7100
  - From: manny
- Re: FCI 7100
  - From: Jim Rojas

Prev by Message: Re: ADT Security Canada
Next by Message: Re: need an installation manual
Previous by thread: Re: FCI 7100
Next by thread: Re: FCI 7100
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home