[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Central Station Service" Poll



here in Quebec we don't need to have a central station to monitor any fire
alarm system unless the insurance company ask for it..

but in some city ,there is some ahj that will ask you to have the system
monitored..

they say that it help the customer keeping its system trouble free..

in fact it make some sense,how many times I entered a small shopping
mall,and walking in front of the fire alarm panel close of the main entry
way ,and the panel was in trouble state (silenced) and was still in trouble
the next week and on and on..


<2alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
J1M8f.16210$_31.3018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for all your comments. Getting opinions by the professionals of
> this group is a big help.
> We here in the State of Florida are being challenged by some local
> municipalities when it comes to commercial fire alarm systems. The AHJ's
> in these south Florida cities and counties are requiring UL or FM listing
> on every commercial fire alarm system, because of the way they are
> interpreting NFPA 72. Seems they think that NFPA 72 requires all systems
> to have "Central Station Service" and that means Certificated or
> Placarded. They also know that State law does not allow them to require
> more than a State license, but they don't care about Florida statutes that
> covers the license holders.
> Are there any other States that are faced with this type of certificated
> or placarded requirements, enforced only by the AHJ's?
>
> Thanks
> Norm Mugford
> Licensed Alarm Contractor and
> Chairman, Florida Electrical Contractors Licensing Board.
>
>
> "Al Colombo" <securitymission@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1130527289.224895.270870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Another way to put it is some AHJs require the moon and the sun so to
>> cover their butts if "anything" should go wrong.  I wonder whether
>> they'd rethink their position on this if they had to pay out that kind
>> of cash for a fire alarm system.  Perhaps they'd think twice about
>> making others do it when it's not really necessary.
>>
>> I'm all for fire safety, but I'm not especially keen on throwing
>> dollars needlessly at an installation just so an AHJ can feel
>> comfortable at night when they go to bed :-).  At the same time, I've
>> seen AHJs who require very little.  There ought to be a balance (while
>> still observing code) with a good helping of common sense thrown in to
>> boot.
>>
>>
>> Al
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Start your day with the Security Mission News & Comment Page!
>> While you're there, cast your vote on our latest security poll:"Are
>> police departments justified in using a no-response policy when
>> an account experiences too many false alarms?"
>> www.alcolombo.info
>>
>
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home