Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems

[-pull@shoot]

On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:08:06 -0400, "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>Interference is avoided by repeatingly sending the signal across an FM band
>comparable in "width" to the FM band on your radio.

Oh yes? Where do you have that comparable frequency band with?

> That's a lot of
>frequencies to jam or otherwise have interference. One of the multiple
>signals is bound to get through and it only takes one.

How is it possible to tell such a noncense..

>Because there's no wire (or EOL), the transmitter has to send check-in
>signals to ensure it is able to report an alarm (supervision).
>If the receiver doesn't see the check-in signals, it complains to the poor
>sap carrying the pager.

look at my next post:
24. RF Interference detection, does it exists on Wireless Alarm
Systems?

>So, it seems we're doing the best we can where it's unrealistic to use wire,

Of course "the best you can"... No way you can avoid RFI.

>If you have a better idea, I'd like to hear it.

You can't do better, you can't avoid RFI.
 RFI muzzle wireless alarm systems and can't be avoided nor detected
in a reasonable time span to warn about possible intruder alarm
jamming and avoid huge false alarms.

Good attempt to flood the fish. Full stop.


><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
>>
>> Are you an old or will you be a new VICTIM of wireless alarm
>>  systems wrong advertisements and sellers talk?
>>
>> Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)
>> without warning to the owner or CS and nothing can prevent it.
>>
>> TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved transmitter...
>>
>> :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
>> www.mipot.com
>> http://www.aurel.it/
>> www.rfsolutions.co.uk
>>
>> OR
>>
>>  Ask "so called" professionals to explain you why wireless alarm
>> systems are reliable and how they avoid RFI, the well known nuisances
>> of low power radio wave reception.