Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems

["mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ya, I know, Jim. I tried to reason with this idiot a couple of years ago (as
did you, if memory serves :-) and quickly realized it was futile.
However, every now and then I think we have to respond 'just for trhe
record' in case some hapless reader really does believe we won't take him
on.
But I appreciate the sentiment... I'll just go back to banging my head
against a wall. I'd like to introduce this asshole to some folks who were
VERY grateful that they had a portable transmitter that not only worked when
they needed it but may very well have saved their life (or considerable
anguish, to say the least)

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ZPtme.12713$tv3.4788@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Mikey, don't waste your time with this guy. He has been polluting Usenet
for
> years with his endless dribble. He will never understand. All we can do is
> sit back and let the clown do his dance routine.
>
> Jim Rojas
>
>
>
> "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:auOdnVhl7Oqm0QffRVn-tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> > news:2rki915vkrlhpe4rlplcui3iipnn8n6uc2@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Are you an old or will you be a new VICTIM of wireless alarm
> >>  systems wrong advertisements and sellers talk?
> >>
> >> Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)
> >> without warning to the owner or CS and nothing can prevent it.
> >>
> >> TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved transmitter...
> >>
> >> :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
> >> www.mipot.com
> >> http://www.aurel.it/
> >> www.rfsolutions.co.uk
> >>
> >> OR
> >>
> >>  Ask "so called" professionals to explain you why wireless alarm
> >> systems are reliable and how they avoid RFI, the well known nuisances
> >> of low power radio wave reception.
> >
> > Interference is avoided by repeatingly sending the signal across an FM
> > band
> > comparable in "width" to the FM band on your radio. That's a lot of
> > frequencies to jam or otherwise have interference. One of the multiple
> > signals is
> > bound to get through and it only takes one.
> > Because there's no wire (or EOL), the transmitter has to send check-in
> > signals
> > to ensure it is able to report an alarm (supervision).
> > If the receiver doesn't see the check-in signals, it complains to the
poor
> > sap carrying
> > the pager.
> > So, it seems we're doing the best we can where it's unrealistic to use
> > wire,
> > Paul.
> > If you have a better idea, I'd like to hear it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>