Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul makes things up as he goes along...which should be =
obvious!...everything he spews is a pigment of his drug induced =
imagination and paranoia. He's very sick you know...very sick indeed.


"Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:puudnerZ24qDoAbfRVn-3g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I've never heard of the term flood the fish, my guess is thats it just =
a
> poor translation on Pauls part, it may be something to do with red =
herrings
> or more likely a misunderstanding/misuse of the phrase "a fish out of =
water"
>=20
> Doug L
>=20
> Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:A6Gme.9695$qJ3.3485@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > It sounds like a British slang term. I can only guess that it means =
"don't
> > waste your time". Since fish live in water, flooding them would be a =
big
> > waste of time... :)
> >
> > Jim Rojas
> >
> >
> > "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:6Nxme.68$gi2.11909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Jim, any idea what "flood the fish" means? Paul is such a =
maroon...sheesh.
> >
> >
> > "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:ZPtme.12713$tv3.4788@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Mikey, don't waste your time with this guy. He has been polluting =
Usenet
> > > for
> > > years with his endless dribble. He will never understand. All we =
can do
> is
> > > sit back and let the clown do his dance routine.
> > >
> > > Jim Rojas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:auOdnVhl7Oqm0QffRVn-tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > <-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> > > > news:2rki915vkrlhpe4rlplcui3iipnn8n6uc2@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>
> > > >> Are you an old or will you be a new VICTIM of wireless alarm
> > > >>  systems wrong advertisements and sellers talk?
> > > >>
> > > >> Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency =
Interferences
> (RFI)
> > > >> without warning to the owner or CS and nothing can prevent it.
> > > >>
> > > >> TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved =
transmitter...
> > > >>
> > > >> :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
> > > >> www.mipot.com
> > > >> http://www.aurel.it/
> > > >> www.rfsolutions.co.uk
> > > >>
> > > >> OR
> > > >>
> > > >>  Ask "so called" professionals to explain you why wireless =
alarm
> > > >> systems are reliable and how they avoid RFI, the well known =
nuisances
> > > >> of low power radio wave reception.
> > > >
> > > > Interference is avoided by repeatingly sending the signal across =
an FM
> > > > band
> > > > comparable in "width" to the FM band on your radio. That's a lot =
of
> > > > frequencies to jam or otherwise have interference. One of the =
multiple
> > > > signals is
> > > > bound to get through and it only takes one.
> > > > Because there's no wire (or EOL), the transmitter has to send =
check-in
> > > > signals
> > > > to ensure it is able to report an alarm (supervision).
> > > > If the receiver doesn't see the check-in signals, it complains =
to the
> > > > poor
> > > > sap carrying
> > > > the pager.
> > > > So, it seems we're doing the best we can where it's unrealistic =
to use
> > > > wire,
> > > > Paul.
> > > > If you have a better idea, I'd like to hear it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>=20
>