Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim, any idea what "flood the fish" means? Paul is such a =
maroon...sheesh.


"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:ZPtme.12713$tv3.4788@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Mikey, don't waste your time with this guy. He has been polluting =
Usenet for=20
> years with his endless dribble. He will never understand. All we can =
do is=20
> sit back and let the clown do his dance routine.
>=20
> Jim Rojas
>=20
>=20
>=20
> "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:auOdnVhl7Oqm0QffRVn-tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> > news:2rki915vkrlhpe4rlplcui3iipnn8n6uc2@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Are you an old or will you be a new VICTIM of wireless alarm
> >>  systems wrong advertisements and sellers talk?
> >>
> >> Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency Interferences =
(RFI)
> >> without warning to the owner or CS and nothing can prevent it.
> >>
> >> TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved transmitter...
> >>
> >> :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
> >> www.mipot.com
> >> http://www.aurel.it/
> >> www.rfsolutions.co.uk
> >>
> >> OR
> >>
> >>  Ask "so called" professionals to explain you why wireless alarm
> >> systems are reliable and how they avoid RFI, the well known =
nuisances
> >> of low power radio wave reception.
> >
> > Interference is avoided by repeatingly sending the signal across an =
FM=20
> > band
> > comparable in "width" to the FM band on your radio. That's a lot of
> > frequencies to jam or otherwise have interference. One of the =
multiple
> > signals is
> > bound to get through and it only takes one.
> > Because there's no wire (or EOL), the transmitter has to send =
check-in
> > signals
> > to ensure it is able to report an alarm (supervision).
> > If the receiver doesn't see the check-in signals, it complains to =
the poor
> > sap carrying
> > the pager.
> > So, it seems we're doing the best we can where it's unrealistic to =
use=20
> > wire,
> > Paul.
> > If you have a better idea, I'd like to hear it.
> >
> >
> >
> >=20
>=20
>