Re: NFPA's Creation of Security Standards/Codes

["Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Timely question Mr. Colombo...

If the proposed standards are intended to reduce false alarms, then local
and state governments have a reasonable interest in enforcing them.  But if
the purpose is to set protection standards, that really isn't the business
of government.  Private sector interests, such as underwriters, have already
done a good job promulgating performance minima for burglar alarms in the
form of UL standards.  The fact that only a tiny fraction of burglar alarms
comply with UL is not an indicator of a need for more regulations.  It is
simply evidence that most people and most firms are unwilling to spend the
money to install comprehensive protection.  That is and should remain the
prerogative of individuals and companies who buy alarms -- not the state or
the community.

If performance standards are set by governent the cost of basic protection
is certain to grow beyond the reach of many consumers.  The net effect will
be less protection for most people and more protection for a small segment
of society.  Hmm.  Sounds almost Republican... :^)

--

Regards,
Robert L Bass

=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
2291 Pine View Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34231
877-722-8900 Sales & Tech Support
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>