[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner

Subject: Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
From: "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:21:10 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <Lf6dnee6dMLhrtXfRVn_vg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <6oKdnf59raHFpdXfRVn-1Q@xxxxxxxxxx> <Ke-dnYaGiaWOcdXfRVn-qg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <D-idnUIEcOUf0tTfRVn-3Q@xxxxxxxxxx> <2id2e.2$Mq2.130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dce2e.80421$Q83.23404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The point I was commenting on (perhaps too quickly) was based on my
assumption that the board was locked in hardware, not that the installer
code was changed. Who doesn't changet the installer code, and rightly so !
However, locking a customer permanently out of his fully owned and fully
paid for property is quite another thing...

RHC

"DrPhil" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dce2e.80421$Q83.23404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or...........he could be a burglar looking for away to break in. which
> would be easy to do with a few keypresses to disable monitoring if the
> installer code had not been changed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: DrPhil

References:
- CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: RG
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: R.H.Campbell
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: Doug L
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: R.H.Campbell
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
  - From: DrPhil

Prev by Message: Re: cleaner wiring solution needed
Next by Message: Re: Another Microkey Question... any takers?
Previous by thread: Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
Next by thread: Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home