Re: My thoughts on Robert Bass

["bigfoot" <nospam@xxxxxxx>]

Maybe Mug will let you do some installs for him till you get enuf done
'legally' to apply for your FL license.
I f you ask real nice;)

"bean" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GZZ1e.67093$6g7.48078@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:DMWdnSKKFtQUvNjfRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> The post isn't whether you should or
> >> shouldn't, just a clarification as to
> >> eligibility.
> >
> > The fact is I'm completely eligible.  Saying that the law is complex and
> > the process involved doesn't change a thing.  The law is quite clear on
> > who can or cannot be licensed and there's nothing in it that would
prevent
> > me from doing so.  I've read it from cover to cover quite recently.
> > Saying that it's always changing means nothing.  As it stands today
> > there's nothing to prohibit me from licensure other than me not being
> > interested in doing licensed work.
>
> I have taken and passed the test on the first try many years ago.  What
Bob
> is saying and you are conveniently not addressing is that there has to be
> extensive verifiable work done in the alarm industry in the period
> "immediately"  preceding your application, not 3, 4, or 5 years ago.  I
had
> to supply info [name, address, telephone # , work done on about 50
> installations that were legally done in the previous year] before they
would
> even allow me to sit for a test.  Sure you are eligible to 'apply' but
> without verifiable completed installations in the 'immediate' time period
> before your application they won't even give you a date to show up and
> prove, as you say, that you can pass the test.  And since you haven't done
> any legal and verifiable alarm work in this time period...............you
> are out of luck on becoming licensed in FL.  Sorry
>
>