Re:

[Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>...  I don't remember what happened...
>
>
> If you would tell the truth once in a while you wouldn't have so much
> trouble "remembering" your original story.
>
>
>> You weren't there...
>
>
> No one was.  It didn't happen.  You made it up.
>
>
>>The top of the ladder moved (slid, jumped, fell) into a large splice box...
>
>
> This is where your story falls apart.  The fictitious ladder it
> couldn't slide or fall into the fictitious surface mounted electrical
> cabinet.  It would literally have to jump more than four inches off the
> beam, move sideways half the width of the ladder (so that the top rail
> could dip into the fictitious, open front, high voltage cabinet) and
> then drop into place.
>
> I've had ladders slide sideways occasionally when they're not planted
> on a good surface and the top is slippery.  I've also seen ladders move
> back away from a beam when placed to near the vertical.  What you will
> NOT see is a ladder pop off the beam, move sideways and then drop into
> a fictitious surface-mounted cabinet.  Like with your lie about
> *suddenly* going inverted in a 737 (something that particular airplane
> is physically incapable of doing), your story violates the laws of
> physics.
>
> Face it, Olson.  You lied.  You got caught.  Everyone knows you're
> totally FOS.  Get over it.  Move on.  Step in something.  Whatever.
>


Actually I hit "send" before I meant to and cancelled this post but
apparently your server didn't see fit to honour that.  Since then, I had
decided that arguing with the foremost liar in Usenet was pretty well
pointless.  "Fill your boots", Robert...  I've got "bigger fish" to fry
than you...  :-)