Re: Next Alarm

["Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pdeig1t4ocl4vco412fhf6er0j40f1aqjr@xxxxxxxxxx
> > That's not true. Their methods were in question...particularly the non
UL
> > compliant ones...
>
> Which non-UL compliant methods?  I'm not doubting you.  I don't
> recall a discussion about that.
>
>
They use a device that intercepts the dial attempt, and re-routes it over
the internet. They don't need to get into programming, nor even care about a
lock code. They take advantage of the poor security you have with
practically every panel on the market. No message authentication. I'd give
you some ideas why this is bad, and not a listed UL method of monitoring
LSD's, but I don't think this is the place to discuss a major, existing
security issue.

Jack