[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Next Alarm

Subject: Re: Next Alarm
From: "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:27:21 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <dd4vtt$8f2k$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Z6ydnVB2Lo_O_ZreRVn-2g@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <na6gg1tpue3cvnbsnkeaj9md7juls09cnq@xxxxxxx>

That's not true. Their methods were in question...particularly the non UL
compliant ones...

"Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:na6gg1tpue3cvnbsnkeaj9md7juls09cnq@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Roberto, I have been a customer of Next Alarm
> > for about a year and have been very satisfied
> > with the service.
>
> I've heard good things about them from several customers.  The
> only bad things I've heard were from alarm dealers who seem to be
> offended that they charge so little for their services.
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
> www.BassBurglarAlarms.com
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
> http://www.bassburglaralarms.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Next Alarm
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Next Alarm
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- Next Alarm
  - From: Roberto
- Re: Next Alarm
  - From: Jack
- Re: Next Alarm
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Help on alarm
Next by Message: DuMP DuMP DuMP .....
Previous by thread: Re: Next Alarm
Next by thread: Re: Next Alarm
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home