Re: Next Alarm

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Jackcsg wrote:
> "Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pdeig1t4ocl4vco412fhf6er0j40f1aqjr@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > That's not true. Their methods were in question...particularly the non
> UL
> > > compliant ones...
> >
> > Which non-UL compliant methods?  I'm not doubting you.  I don't
> > recall a discussion about that.
> >
> >
> They use a device that intercepts the dial attempt, and re-routes it over
> the internet. They don't need to get into programming, nor even care about a
> lock code. They take advantage of the poor security you have with
> practically every panel on the market. No message authentication. I'd give
> you some ideas why this is bad, and not a listed UL method of monitoring
> LSD's, but I don't think this is the place to discuss a major, existing
> security issue.

Good call Jack.

You'll remember that Fat ASS likes to let everyone know everything
about anything. Security isn't the point with him. It's how good he can
look to someone, by telling them things they really don't have to know,
so they'll buy something from him.