Re: Lufkin Security Experiances

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rWx4e.1$3n3.37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
otay thanks!

slightly diff topic:

I did a ADT takeover a couple of days ago it was a Vista 10se, the chip said
Version 12 (?)...panel looked new but client said it's been in for
years..but Ver. 12 ? Did ADT have it's own chip versions 7-10 years ago?
Panel programming matched the sheet I brought...except for one entry.


The Vista-10SE stopped at v15 so it might indeed be old, as far as ADT their
versions usually follow Honeywell/Ademco's as far as I know

(I know ours does anyway)



"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9OedndFcCtjEjM_fRVn-3Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:BSk4e.46$Sd3.1045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> inline...
>
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:DKKdnYepA6-bJ8zfRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:Veb4e.7$Sd3.44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Yah, addressing non-supervised keypads always confuses me. I still hit
> > myself in the head after pulling the 6139 and discovering the 6148 has
no
> > display because I forgot to set the addressssss on it...DUH.
> >
> > The fun part is when you set the programming keypad to the same address
as
> > another keypad, it won't let you into programming
>
> hmmm i think ive done that too.
>
> >
> > Still confuses me about setting the daily test schedule vs. installer
code
> > #00 thing for daily tests.
> >
> > They made it easier to setup daily, weekly, monthly test reporting with
> that
> > method than going into scheduling and doing it the hard way, works
pretty
> > well too and beats walking someone through schedules
>
> Soooo  you're saying I don't havta set the scheds...sheesh. I've been
doing
> it BOTH ways to be safe.
>
> It automatically sets the test time in schedule 11, never hurts to check
it
> either way since you may run into a v1 and not realize it, only the v2 and
> up support that feature
>
>
>