[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue

Subject: Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:59:45 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <HtOdnXQ6NcYjB_bfRVn-vg@xxxxxxxxxxx> <J65be.3215$u56.1681@trndny09> <vd5be.4228$WX.2218@trndny01> <ZJCdnZvBd-sjb_HfRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4--dnZqqsKS6mvDfRVn-rQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <G-Kdnf1dNo7NkPDfRVn-2Q@xxxxxxxxxxx> <hg9be.1131216$Xk.392642@pd7tw3no>

"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hg9be.1131216$Xk.392642@xxxxxxxxxxx

Addendum:

In the last go around regarding this issue, Michael Baker quoted both
chapter and verse of NFPA (just as Doug has done here).  You are wrong
Robert, but your heart is in the right place.  I've maintained throughtout
this discussion (and the previous iterations as well) that using an
unsupervised life safety device in this manner is unsound, unprofessional,
and unsafe.  I don't think anyone here (including you) would disagree on
that point.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Robert L. Bass

References:
- Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Nick Markowitz
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Nick Markowitz
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Doug L
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Lufkin Security Experiances
Next by Message: Re: Brinks as stand-alone alarm
Previous by thread: Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
Next by thread: Re: Fire Side Chat -- Fire Alarm Code Issue
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home