[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Topic 1: Base Level Status Schema
- Subject: Re: Topic 1: Base Level Status Schema
- From: Patrick Lidstone
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:15:00 +0000
> And re Stuarts comment below - any feedback ? - I personally am
sort of
> against having multiple bodies as the way to do this mainly because
I am
> considering the size of the packets but maybe it's correct ??
Multiple bodies really doesn't have much to do with message size -
but it has a huge impact on the resuability and inheritability of
schemas. It provides a terrific, extensible, message structure, that
is really fundamental to the long term future of xAP. I know that
sounds over-dramatic, but it is true. It provides a mechanism whereby
we can add support for additional, completely new, functions later,
as devices arrive on the market, without compromising the message
structure of existing devices, and without requiring a huge effort in
terms of regressions testing.
My 2p
Patrick
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|