RE: NAS or WHS

[Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes - already explored that route but the two servers need lots of CPU
power (exchange and general stuff on one and Sharepoint server on the other
which is very resource hungry). Could save a fair bit of cash with
virtualisation though if it was possible.

Shame the virtualisation products don't allow better control of hardware
like the geovision, ADSL cards etc - I could really do with that.

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Mark McCall
> Sent: 27 November 2008 14:31
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NAS or WHS
>
> > as I already have two Win 2008 servers, XP HA server and XP
Geovision
> > CCTV PC running here, a fifth box might just be a little
overkill!!!
>
> Sounds like time for a little virtualisation Paul!  Prob have to keep
> the
> CCTV and HA servers physical, but the rest?
>
> M.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ********************************************
> Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
> http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
> ********************************************
>
>
>

------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************