The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAS or WHS



Thanks Paul - shame about that :(

Maybe WHS would run in a virtual environment though ????

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gordon
> Sent: 27 November 2008 14:50
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NAS or WHS
>
> I have previously mentioned this to a Microsoftie that I know, and the
> answer is almost certainly not. I said I specifically thought that it
> would be an ideal candidate for inclusion in their small business
> server
> products rather than the full-blown enterprise server line, but it
> sounds like it is definitely not currently on the roadmap for any
other
> product than WHS (Why do I always think of W.H. Smiths whenever I use
> that abbreviation!?)
>
> Paul G.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gale
> Sent: 27 November 2008 14:27
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NAS or WHS
>
> Anyone know if the backup technology they use is available for other
> windows server products (i.e. Windows 2008)?
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ********************************************
> Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
> http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
> ********************************************
>
>
>

------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.