The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAS or WHS

Subject: RE: NAS or WHS
From: "Mark McCall" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:31:01 -0000
References: <492E6BB7.8090201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <003c01c95081$abfe1ad0$03fa5070$@net> <003201c95085$2a8c4cc0$0200a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <564D52CC2069D44EB996CDEAD94D911E1F0B068E3B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> as I already have two Win 2008 servers, XP HA server and XP
Geovision
> CCTV PC running here, a fifth box might just be a little overkill!!!

Sounds like time for a little virtualisation Paul!  Prob have to keep the
CCTV and HA servers physical, but the rest?

M.



------------------------------------

********************************************
Limited Time Offer - Free iPhone VAT Calculator
http://berble.com/index.php/component/content/article/109
********************************************

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAS or WHS
  - From: John Benfield
- RE: NAS or WHS
  - From: Paul Gale

References:
- NAS or WHS
  - From: Geoff H
- RE: NAS or WHS
  - From: Keith Finnett
- RE: NAS or WHS
  - From: Mark McCall
- RE: NAS or WHS
  - From: Paul Gale

Prev by Message: RE: NAS or WHS
Next by Message: Re: NAS or WHS
Previous by thread: RE: NAS or WHS
Next by thread: Re: NAS or WHS
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.