Re: [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower

["Ho Yin Ng" <architect.hoyin@xxxxxxxxx>]

No I just got the package 36025:

http://www.grohe.co.uk/t/25_731.html

It comes with universal Movario Trio shower set which includes the shower
h=
ead.

This is as far as I am aware the standard package.

Ho-yin

On 11/09/2007, Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought the Grohe didn't come with a shower head and the Aqualisa
did -=
are you saying that yours did (or you had some kind of package deal)?
>
> The best prices I found previously were =A3349 for the aqualisa and
=A383=
for the wireless remote.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of Ho Yin Ng
> > Sent: 11 September 2007 10:16
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
> >
> > Yes includes everything.
> >
> > I got the Grohe Wireless for =A3449
> >
> > The equivalent Aqualisa is approx =A3445 + =A380 for the wireless
remot=
e.
> >
> > Note however I am using the unpumped version as I have a combi.
> >
> > Ho-Yin
> >
> > On 11/09/2007, Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Ah that's interesting - I have the Aqualisa on my spec for
the loft
> > bathroom as I thought it was a fair bit cheaper than the Grohe.
Was
> > your pricing including shower head and fittings etc?
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> > > > Of Ho Yin Ng
> > > > Sent: 11 September 2007 09:47
> > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital
shower
> > > >
> > > > In the end I actually went for the Grohe Wireless. It
worked out
> > > > cheaper
> > > > than getting the entire Aqualisa set with wireless
remote as the
> > Grohe
> > > > includes it within the pack.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all your advice it was much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if SWMBO will insist that the remote is placed
next to the
> > > > bed?
> > > >
> > > > Ho-Yin
> > > >
> > > > On 07/09/2007, Rob Heyes <mh001b4520@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >   The pumped version has a boost button but the
unpumped just has
> > the
> > > > one
> > > > > button.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Rob
> > > > > Ho Yin Ng wrote:
> > > > > > I thought the Quartz was the one with the
single round control?
> > The
> > > > Axis
> > > > > is
> > > > > > the one with the vertical column with a
number of buttons.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was not aware that there is no flow
control. Trying to think
> > > > whether
> > > > > there
> > > > > > is any disadvantage in this ... for having a
shower or filling
> > up
> > > > the
> > > > > bath.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does the Axis have any flow control? Sounds a
bit strange
> > really,
> > > > what
> > > > > > happens if I have a small child and they
don't want the water
> > so
> > > > > powerful?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Though I won't have 3.5bar.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Grohe units all need min 3 bar.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They look good and I like the idea of having
a remote switch
> > but
> > > > having
> > > > > no
> > > > > > flow control is a real turn off.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ho yin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 06/09/2007, Rob Mouser <groups@xxxxxxx
> > > > <groups%40mouser.co.uk>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> Yep I have two. Both with remote
switches, both un-pumped
> > versions
> > > > fed
> > > > > >> by a 3.5 bar whole house pump. They IMHO
are absolutely
> > brilliant,
> > > > the
> > > > > >> best shower I've ever had, anywhere.
> > > > > >> I stay in a lot of hotels, lots of them
with supposed "super
> > > > doper"
> > > > > >> power showers but nothing matches the
ones at home.
> > > > > >> They also look the dogs danglies, we have
the Quartz units but
> > > > have
> > > > > used
> > > > > >> the Axis heads as I think they are
aesthetically nicer. Just
> > that
> > > > nice
> > > > > >> round control, with a nice LED :-p and a
head.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Rob
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > > ps.com> [mailto:
> > > > > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > > ps.com>] On Behalf
> > > > > >>> Of Paul Gale
> > > > > >>> Sent: 06 September 2007 14:54
> > > > > >>> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > > ps.com>
> > > > > >>> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis
quartz digital shower
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The other option is a Grohe Grohterm
wireless system - more
> > > > expensive
> > > > > >>> than the Aqualisa controller though
but I think it has more
> > > > features.
> > > > > >>> Both are a bit plasticy though :(
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Paul.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >>>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > > ps.com> [mailto:
> > > > > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > > ps.com>] On
> > > > > >>> Behalf
> > > > > >>>> Of Ho Yin Ng
> > > > > >>>> Sent: 06 September 2007 12:57
> > > > > >>>> To: ukha_d;
> > > >
uk_selfbuild@xxxxxxx<uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > > > > <uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > > > > >>>> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis
quartz digital shower
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Does anyone have one?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I am thinking of installing one
to a combi with 1.5 bar of
> > > > dynamic
> > > > > >>>> pressure.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Plus putting in a wireless remote
switch. The only problem
> > is
> > > > they
> > > > > >>>> don't have a valve with a built
in diverter so I will have
> > to
> > > > > >> install
> > > > > >>>> an additional diverter so that it
can fill my bath.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Can anyone share any experience
they have had with it?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Ho yin
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>