RE: [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I thought the Grohe didn't come with a shower head and the Aqualisa
did - a=
re you saying that yours did (or you had some kind of package deal)?

The best prices I found previously were =A3349 for the aqualisa and =A383
f=
or the wireless remote.

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Ho Yin Ng
> Sent: 11 September 2007 10:16
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
>=20
> Yes includes everything.
>=20
> I got the Grohe Wireless for =A3449
>=20
> The equivalent Aqualisa is approx =A3445 + =A380 for the wireless
remote.
>=20
> Note however I am using the unpumped version as I have a combi.
>=20
> Ho-Yin
>=20
> On 11/09/2007, Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ah that's interesting - I have the Aqualisa on my spec for the
loft
> bathroom as I thought it was a fair bit cheaper than the Grohe. Was
> your pricing including shower head and fittings etc?
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > > Of Ho Yin Ng
> > > Sent: 11 September 2007 09:47
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
> > >
> > > In the end I actually went for the Grohe Wireless. It worked
out
> > > cheaper
> > > than getting the entire Aqualisa set with wireless remote as
the
> Grohe
> > > includes it within the pack.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all your advice it was much appreciated.
> > >
> > > I wonder if SWMBO will insist that the remote is placed next
to the
> > > bed?
> > >
> > > Ho-Yin
> > >
> > > On 07/09/2007, Rob Heyes <mh001b4520@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   The pumped version has a boost button but the
unpumped just has
> the
> > > one
> > > > button.
> > > >
> > > > --Rob
> > > > Ho Yin Ng wrote:
> > > > > I thought the Quartz was the one with the single
round control?
> The
> > > Axis
> > > > is
> > > > > the one with the vertical column with a number of
buttons.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was not aware that there is no flow control.
Trying to think
> > > whether
> > > > there
> > > > > is any disadvantage in this ... for having a
shower or filling
> up
> > > the
> > > > bath.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does the Axis have any flow control? Sounds a bit
strange
> really,
> > > what
> > > > > happens if I have a small child and they don't
want the water
> so
> > > > powerful?
> > > > >
> > > > > Though I won't have 3.5bar.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Grohe units all need min 3 bar.
> > > > >
> > > > > They look good and I like the idea of having a
remote switch
> but
> > > having
> > > > no
> > > > > flow control is a real turn off.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ho yin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06/09/2007, Rob Mouser <groups@xxxxxxx
> > > <groups%40mouser.co.uk>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Yep I have two. Both with remote switches,
both un-pumped
> versions
> > > fed
> > > > >> by a 3.5 bar whole house pump. They IMHO are
absolutely
> brilliant,
> > > the
> > > > >> best shower I've ever had, anywhere.
> > > > >> I stay in a lot of hotels, lots of them with
supposed "super
> > > doper"
> > > > >> power showers but nothing matches the ones at
home.
> > > > >> They also look the dogs danglies, we have the
Quartz units but
> > > have
> > > > used
> > > > >> the Axis heads as I think they are
aesthetically nicer. Just
> that
> > > nice
> > > > >> round control, with a nice LED :-p and a head.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Rob
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > ps.com> [mailto:
> > > > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > ps.com>] On Behalf
> > > > >>> Of Paul Gale
> > > > >>> Sent: 06 September 2007 14:54
> > > > >>> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > ps.com>
> > > > >>> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz
digital shower
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The other option is a Grohe Grohterm
wireless system - more
> > > expensive
> > > > >>> than the Aqualisa controller though but I
think it has more
> > > features.
> > > > >>> Both are a bit plasticy though :(
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Paul.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >>>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > ps.com> [mailto:
> > > > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > > > ps.com>] On
> > > > >>> Behalf
> > > > >>>> Of Ho Yin Ng
> > > > >>>> Sent: 06 September 2007 12:57
> > > > >>>> To: ukha_d;
> > > uk_selfbuild@xxxxxxx<uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > > > <uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > > > >>>> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz
digital shower
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Does anyone have one?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I am thinking of installing one to a
combi with 1.5 bar of
> > > dynamic
> > > > >>>> pressure.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Plus putting in a wireless remote
switch. The only problem
> is
> > > they
> > > > >>>> don't have a valve with a built in
diverter so I will have
> to
> > > > >> install
> > > > >>>> an additional diverter so that it can
fill my bath.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Can anyone share any experience they
have had with it?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Ho yin
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20