RE: [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah that's interesting - I have the Aqualisa on my spec for the loft
bathroom as I thought it was a fair bit cheaper than the Grohe. Was your
pricing including shower head and fittings etc?

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Ho Yin Ng
> Sent: 11 September 2007 09:47
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital shower
>
> In the end I actually went for the Grohe Wireless. It worked out
> cheaper
> than getting the entire Aqualisa set with wireless remote as the Grohe
> includes it within the pack.
>
> Thanks for all your advice it was much appreciated.
>
> I wonder if SWMBO will insist that the remote is placed next to the
> bed?
>
> Ho-Yin
>
> On 07/09/2007, Rob Heyes <mh001b4520@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >   The pumped version has a boost button but the unpumped just has
the
> one
> > button.
> >
> > --Rob
> > Ho Yin Ng wrote:
> > > I thought the Quartz was the one with the single round
control? The
> Axis
> > is
> > > the one with the vertical column with a number of buttons.
> > >
> > > I was not aware that there is no flow control. Trying to
think
> whether
> > there
> > > is any disadvantage in this ... for having a shower or
filling up
> the
> > bath.
> > >
> > > Does the Axis have any flow control? Sounds a bit strange
really,
> what
> > > happens if I have a small child and they don't want the
water so
> > powerful?
> > >
> > > Though I won't have 3.5bar.
> > >
> > > The Grohe units all need min 3 bar.
> > >
> > > They look good and I like the idea of having a remote switch
but
> having
> > no
> > > flow control is a real turn off.
> > >
> > > Ho yin
> > >
> > > On 06/09/2007, Rob Mouser <groups@xxxxxxx
> <groups%40mouser.co.uk>>
> > wrote:
> > >> Yep I have two. Both with remote switches, both
un-pumped versions
> fed
> > >> by a 3.5 bar whole house pump. They IMHO are absolutely
brilliant,
> the
> > >> best shower I've ever had, anywhere.
> > >> I stay in a lot of hotels, lots of them with supposed
"super
> doper"
> > >> power showers but nothing matches the ones at home.
> > >> They also look the dogs danglies, we have the Quartz
units but
> have
> > used
> > >> the Axis heads as I think they are aesthetically nicer.
Just that
> nice
> > >> round control, with a nice LED :-p and a head.
> > >>
> > >> Rob
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > ps.com> [mailto:
> > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > ps.com>] On Behalf
> > >>> Of Paul Gale
> > >>> Sent: 06 September 2007 14:54
> > >>> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > ps.com>
> > >>> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital
shower
> > >>>
> > >>> The other option is a Grohe Grohterm wireless system
- more
> expensive
> > >>> than the Aqualisa controller though but I think it
has more
> features.
> > >>> Both are a bit plasticy though :(
> > >>>
> > >>> Paul.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com><ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > ps.com> [mailto:
> > >> ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> <ukha_d%40yahoogrou
> > ps.com>] On
> > >>> Behalf
> > >>>> Of Ho Yin Ng
> > >>>> Sent: 06 September 2007 12:57
> > >>>> To: ukha_d;
> uk_selfbuild@xxxxxxx<uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > <uk_selfbuild%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> > >>>> Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Aqualis quartz digital
shower
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Does anyone have one?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am thinking of installing one to a combi with
1.5 bar of
> dynamic
> > >>>> pressure.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Plus putting in a wireless remote switch. The
only problem is
> they
> > >>>> don't have a valve with a built in diverter so I
will have to
> > >> install
> > >>>> an additional diverter so that it can fill my
bath.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can anyone share any experience they have had
with it?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ho yin
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>