[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [OT] CCTV Rant
I'd already read through that, but it's not so comprehensive that it
makes the legalities of home CCTV use clearer than mud. It seems aimed
at businesses, rather than home users, and the rules can be very different.
Mal
Tim Hawes wrote:
>
> On 11/1/07, Mal Lansell <mal@xxxxxxx <mailto:mal%40lansell.org>>
> wrote:
> > My brother wanted to do the same thing but the police told him
that
> > a camera covering the road / pavement outside his house would
have
> > to be registered under the Data Protection Act.
> >
> > As far as I've been able to discern, though, that is complete
> > horsesh*t.
>
> Maybe it is, but maybe not, see:
> http://www.ico.gov.uk/Home/for_organisations/topic_specific_guides/cctv.aspx
> <http://www.ico.gov.uk/Home/for_organisations/topic_specific_guides/cctv.aspx>
>
> That website is pretty comprehensive from what I recall.
>
> HTH,
>
> Tim.
>
> >
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|