[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RG6 vs CT100
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RG6 vs CT100
- From: James Hoye <jhoye@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:59:21 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> NTL have now come back to me to say that CT100 is
> unidirectional and with
> NTL's digital cable service they need to send data back up
> the cable as
> opposed to, say Sky (satellite) digital which uses the
> telephone for any
> feedback. As RG6 is bi-directional it is the recommended
> cable. If only I
> knew when I installed CT100!!!
WTF? What planet are these guys on?
I was only joking about cable directionality - it has come up before
regarding speaker cables and laughed down - how can an alternating signal
possibly propogate along a directional cable?
Surely bi-directional is synonymous with uni-directional anyway. And you
trust these people to install cable into your home?
As Mark just said, April 1st is 4 months away....
James H
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975682357/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|