[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: RG6 vs CT100
Totally crazy !
I'd reply with your feet, and install Sky instead
I personally wouldn't let NTL anywhere NEAR by house !
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Hoye" <jhoye@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RG6 vs CT100
> > NTL have now come back to me to say that CT100 is
> > unidirectional and with
> > NTL's digital cable service they need to send data back up
> > the cable as
> > opposed to, say Sky (satellite) digital which uses the
> > telephone for any
> > feedback. As RG6 is bi-directional it is the recommended
> > cable. If only I
> > knew when I installed CT100!!!
>
> WTF? What planet are these guys on?
>
> I was only joking about cable directionality - it has come up before
> regarding speaker cables and laughed down - how can an alternating
signal
> possibly propogate along a directional cable?
>
> Surely bi-directional is synonymous with uni-directional anyway. And
you
> trust these people to install cable into your home?
>
> As Mark just said, April 1st is 4 months away....
>
> James H
>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/2065/_/975683444/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|