[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RG6 vs CT100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RG6 vs CT100
- From: "Roger Bilboul" <Bilboul@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:41:50 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
NTL have now come back to me to say that CT100 is unidirectional and with
NTL's digital cable service they need to send data back up the cable as
opposed to, say Sky (satellite) digital which uses the telephone for any
feedback. As RG6 is bi-directional it is the recommended cable. If only I
knew when I installed CT100!!!
Roger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tracey.gardner [mailto:tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 06:10
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] RG6 vs CT100
>
>
>
>
> >> Agree with James. Your CT100 is a higher quality cable than
RG6.
> >
>
>
> According to my catalogues the relative losses for RG6 and CT100 at
> 400MHz are 13.1db and 13.0db respectively so there's very little to
> choose between them performance wise.
>
> Tracey
>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/2065/_/975681787/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|