[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RG6 vs CT100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RG6 vs CT100
- From: "tracey.gardner" <tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:09:47 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>> Agree with James. Your CT100 is a higher quality cable than RG6.
>
According to my catalogues the relative losses for RG6 and CT100 at
400MHz are 13.1db and 13.0db respectively so there's very little to
choose between them performance wise.
Tracey
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/3/_/2065/_/975363239/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|