Re: IBM bathroom patent symbolic of US patent ills

[James Arthur <dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 28, 1:04 pm, "J.A. Legris" <jaleg...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mar 28, 4:29 pm, James Arthur <dagmargoodb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 27, 4:17 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
>
> > Web-Site.com> wrote:
> > > In the past I've done a lot of expert witness consulting.  This year,
> > > though, I've lost a lot of business by telling potential clients that
> > > their patent wasn't worth the powder to blow it to hell.
>
> > > Unfortunately I sure they found themselves an alternate "expert" who
> > > would swear to anything for a buck :-(
>
> > That's my experience too.  I call it "Newton's Third Law of Experts:
> > For every expert there's an equal and opposite expert."
>
> > Cheers,
> > James Arthur
>
> GImme a break. Why do you think they have juries? [...]

For experts to bamboozle?

Cheers,
James Arthur