[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Insteon/X10

Subject: Re: Insteon/X10
From: "Dan Wright" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:55:43 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <1174611526.163321.166780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1np703higmg1pq0obqqfqguf06rk4jr8t0@xxxxxxx> <_qOdnfkFL9ZerJnbnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <vde803hqllgtct8a85eqlcurlmsebilfd7@xxxxxxx> <GPmdnfAAD-R6GZnbnZ2dnUVZ_tOmnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <7vb903p4ttas4ndvaqke0blnd910hvq2q2@xxxxxxx> <4D3Nh.5073$oV.1626@attbi_s21> <16na039ihgjg0eo2vk809fmvgekaf8od2f@xxxxxxx>

"Marc_F_Hult" <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:16na039ihgjg0eo2vk809fmvgekaf8od2f@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:33:36 GMT, "Dan Wright" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> in
> message  <4D3Nh.5073$oV.1626@attbi_s21>:


>>Anyone interested in this would find Lutron's litigation history
>>instructive.
>
> Might that be why the author outlined the litigation history complete with
> case numbers ?

My point was to suggest that interested parties look back at Lutron's
litigation history prior to their Z-wave suit.  Its quite instructive.



> Did you read the same article that I did?

Quite...and I stand by my position that it was poorly done.

References:
- Insteon/X10
  - From: Paul
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Marc_F_Hult
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Marc_F_Hult
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Marc_F_Hult
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Dan Wright
- Re: Insteon/X10
  - From: Marc_F_Hult

Prev by Message: Re: Does anyone know who is making these light bulbs?
Next by Message: Re: N:Vision CFL's
Previous by thread: Re: Insteon/X10
Next by thread: Re: Insteon/X10
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home