Re: Insteon/X10

[Marc_F_Hult <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:33:36 GMT, "Dan Wright" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message  <4D3Nh.5073$oV.1626@attbi_s21>:

>
>"Marc_F_Hult" <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:7vb903p4ttas4ndvaqke0blnd910hvq2q2@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Point being that Z-wave and Zigbee are also seen as vulnerable.
>
>The article was quite slanted, looking more like a Lutron press
>release than  anything resembling responsible journalism.
>Presumptively since Leviton is  a big dog they did not go into this without
>adequate preparation.

>Anyone interested in this would find Lutron's litigation history
>instructive.

Might that be why the author outlined the litigation history complete with
case numbers ?

Dan also wrote:  "look[s] like a Lutron Press release"

Might that be because the article quotes the Lutron press release verbatim
and clearly identifies it as such?  Because the press release announcing the
lawsuit _was_ , in essence, the news?

Dan also wrote: "Presumptively since Leviton is a big dog they did not go
into this without adequate preparation."

Might that be why the author wrote: " My guess is {Leviton] have some pretty
good lawyers; obviously they knew about Lutron's patents. They must be fairly
certain they're not infringing." ?

Not "responsible journalism"?  What was not responsible?

Did you read the same article that I did?

... Marc
Marc_F_Hult
www.ECOntrol.org