[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10

Subject: Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
From: Reg <reg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:03:45 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <ajk5b2p3v3ns13qeis95ro2jik1ft8jg7o@xxxxxxx> <Y7-dndHczO9JbS_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@xxxxxxx> <t8g6b2h5i7uqiun5jgb5j52cva56l6gkfp@xxxxxxx> <cNKdnUXdG6R40i7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Jack Edin wrote:

> I don't think TED will play nice with X10.
>
> I asked prior to not buying...
>
> You can remove the repeater, if you use the XTB on your controller(s)...
>
> http://jeffvolp.home.att.net/xtb_files.htm
>
> Not sure this'll help TED's situation.
>
> The company who made TED promised a new version by end of Summer, or was
> it year end?
>
> I'm waiting for THAT!

Plus the 5000 model, also not yet released, is supposed to
support an external interface for accessing the data. A
required feature, IMO. It's not very useful without it.

--
Reg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
  - From: Brian W . Antoine

References:
- The Energy Detective versus X-10
  - From: Brian W . Antoine
- Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
  - From: Robert Green
- Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
  - From: Brian W . Antoine
- Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
  - From: Jack Edin

Prev by Message: Re: My latest cool DIY automation idea
Next by Message: Re: INSTEON: Let the recalls begin ...
Previous by thread: Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
Next by thread: Re: The Energy Detective versus X-10
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home