Re: Rosetta progress report

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)]

"Robert Green" <ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

>> I think roZetta will probably suit your needs better than the *X24-AHT
>> although it will require that you use a modified MR26A for RF input.
>
>That's a piece of X-10 gear I *don't* have.  :-(  Any product that
>*required* software produced by X-10 didn't interest me.  The picture looks
>a little like the USB unit that ATI packages with their All-in-Wonder cards
>with RF remotes.

The ATI gear is made by X-10. If you have one, look at the FCC ID. It will
start with the same B4S as all of X-10's.

[more snipping]

>Oh well, it sounded similar to my tin ear.  Does the TW523 use some sort of
>comparator to check the what it hears on the powerline to a command stored
>in its buffer?

No, it merely reports what happened on the powerline 22 half-cycles earlier.