[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?

Subject: Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
From: "Mark Thomas" <mrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6 Jul 2005 10:28:22 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <1120602499.350747.61430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vN2dnbviBNpW1VbfRVn-qw@xxxxxxxxxxx> <08snc1p2bs79ng1bj498lc2vqrjdth2l6u@xxxxxxx>

> Stargate has analog inputs and (last I knew) the HAI line (Omni etc)
> doesn't.
> ...
> HA controllers with analog inputs are intrinsically much more
> powerful than digital-input-only controllers in my opinion -- all else
> equal.

Ah yes, I'd forgotten to mention this... this is a biggie. And in fact
one of the reasons I eventually went with the Ocelot--a $75 add-on
gives you 16 analog inputs.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
  - From: MFHult

References:
- Stargate Vs other home controllers?
  - From: james
- Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
  - From: Brett Griffin
- Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
  - From: MFHult

Prev by Message: Re: Cheap Ethernet indoor temperature sensor
Next by Message: Re: KR19A X-10 Remote gone flakey
Previous by thread: Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
Next by thread: Re: Stargate Vs other home controllers?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home