Re: Do "Pet Immunity" Motion Detectors Really Work?

["RTS" <gafa_usa@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Jim"  wrote in message
news:659f6d6d-55b8-4c45-81c8-8f3ba3ec854e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 2:26:05 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
> And yet the old C&K / Intellisense DT-500 still works pretty good after
> all
>
> these years.  I don't care for them in small to tiny environments, but I
>
> trust them much more than many of the cheaper pet "resistant" motion
> sensors
>
> available today.
>
>
>
> P.S.  I've had decent luck with the Napco Gemini PIRPET wireless motion.
>
> Then, they cost more than the DT-500.
>
>
>
> Bob La Londe
>
I've used Visonic for so many years I've forgotten how long it's been. Gotta
be back to at least the early 80's. Lot's of people don't like them because
(I think it was) the "Fox" model that was really sensitive and were said to
have a lot of false trips. I never had a problem with them though. I've
always had good luck with them. Still have some of the SRN 2000 (I Think)
working all these years. That's the one that has about 25 different lenses.
And I think they still make it.

Now I mostly use the dual/tec Duo 200e and 220 (look down) models which are
not pet immune but I ordered extra pet immune lenses for the K940's which
work in the 200 and 220 if needed. If I have to use more then one motion
detector in close proximity I use a dual tec Duo 200 or 220 and a K940 so I
don't have RF interference problems. That's worked so far.




What I've learned  over the years,   with motion detectors  the golden rule
is  "PLACEMENT"   consider all the factors in the field of view...

RTS


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com