Re: Home cameras for outdoors?

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 11, 9:16=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 8:44=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 11, 10:02=A0am, "RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > reportedly =A0he died..
>
> > > "tourman" =A0wrote in message
>
> > >news:ca9652d1-75e8-4981-8691-7a70ebd9cfc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
...
>
> > > On Jan 10, 9:56 pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > JoeRaisin <joeraisin2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >Dang it all, Graham, there you go stirrin' the pot again.
>
> > > > It has been a little too quiet in here. :-)
>
> > > RHC: Yeah, say what you will about RLB, when he was here things were
> > > much more active than since he left (for whatever reason good or
> > > bad.....).
>
> > > It's really boring now.....
>
> > Question of the wireless cameras I have seen there either low end junk
> > or high end expensive does any one make middle of the road ones-
>
> I don't look at wireless CCTV anymore.
>
> With wireless, (espcially if you're doing it for profit) always has
> that unknown factor. Just where you want to put the camera or the
> receiver is where at least one camera wont work for some unknown and
> undeterminable reason. So now ya hafta start moving things around and
> by the time you're done ( if you're lucky enough to be able to find a
> neutral location for every component and you can see what you wanted
> to see) you may as well have wired the damn thing to begin with.
>
> If it's a DIY'er job, they're willing to spend the time to futz with
> it cuz they're not losing money on the job.

Kind of what I figured all my cams are hardwired coax or cat 5 with
baluns