[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIA standards

Subject: Re: SIA standards
From: nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 03:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <672a5$4d9c6d35$451cfb68$29382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <db057f0a-04dc-4cf7-8897-105c1459d280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a18097db-cb68-4a04-bcd3-c72ccd6e8166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7135f76c-9af6-4ac1-a931-ab9575cbd47f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Apr 6, 11:56=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 4:41=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Only receiver I know that even receives SIA is Osborne Hoffman =A0do no=
t
> > know if they even make them any more
>
> Huh? Just about every receiver currently made supports SIA including
> Silent Knight, Honeywell and especially DSC, we use that format
> extensively due to the longer account number capability
>
> The new Honeywell Lynx Touch supports SIA along with CID

FBII does not  forgot about SK .

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: mleuck

References:
- SIA standards
  - From: jan.halama
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: SRyckman
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: mleuck

Prev by Message: Re: Wireless Alarm System
Next by Message: Re: (OT) Hello there Mr Ryckman!
Previous by thread: Re: SIA standards
Next by thread: Re: SIA standards
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home