[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIA standards

Subject: Re: SIA standards
From: mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <672a5$4d9c6d35$451cfb68$29382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <db057f0a-04dc-4cf7-8897-105c1459d280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a18097db-cb68-4a04-bcd3-c72ccd6e8166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Apr 6, 4:41=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Only receiver I know that even receives SIA is Osborne Hoffman =A0do not
> know if they even make them any more

Huh? Just about every receiver currently made supports SIA including
Silent Knight, Honeywell and especially DSC, we use that format
extensively due to the longer account number capability

The new Honeywell Lynx Touch supports SIA along with CID

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: SRyckman

References:
- SIA standards
  - From: jan.halama
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: SRyckman
- Re: SIA standards
  - From: nick markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: Wireless Alarm System
Next by Message: Re: Wireless Alarm System
Previous by thread: Re: SIA standards
Next by thread: Re: SIA standards
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home