Re: Seeking input

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sep 14, 9:19=A0pm, "Russell Brill" <russwbr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "ABLE1" <royboynos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:LnAjo.152122$iV7.43541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Hello all,
>
> > I have a customer that has a 16 zone hardwired system and wants to
> > upgrade.
>
> > That is not the problem. =A0In his upgrade he want a system that is "We=
b
> > Based" so he can control on line.
>
> > "Web Based" is his term. =A0His primary goal is to have the ability to =
arm
> > and disarm the system and secondary to bypass, change codes, basically =
all
> > the things you can from the keypad.
>
> > I have just started my investigation so I was wondering what input I ca=
n
> > pick up from here.
>
> > Thanks much for all the input I am about to receive.
>
> > Les
>
> I'm not trying to be a jerk, but the industry has enough False Alarms cau=
sed
> by people onsite in front of their keypads, not to mention all of these
> "Gadget People" that want to fart around with their alarms over the
> internet... Sounds like more crap that's going to cause more problems... =
I
> lock my house up and turn the alarm on before I leave the Freaking house.=
..
> I guess I'm just too old and set in my ways for my own good...........

You obviously haven't checked out Alarm.com...