[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Off Topic - But Heinous

Subject: Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
From: "Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:39:30 +1000
Newsgroups: alt.recovery.aa, alt.security.alarms, rec.arts.sf.written
References: <hqao17$b6q$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnhsi9qg.vbn.dbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <84sjs5ljkf3s2pme423tgu7t776oo6mvhd@xxxxxxx> <hqcsvc$n48$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0e2ks5trgnpn4rtp6gssjbp4hr5mg8fjcm@xxxxxxx> <r69r97-4ib.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hqeuj5$qh8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Rule #63 wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> Do u lurve irony 2? ;-)

Yes - pity you never learnt to recognise it...

	Cheers,
		Gary	B-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: Sharx35

References:
- Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: JoeRaisin
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: David DeLaney
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: Bob
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: Gary R. Schmidt
- Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
  - From: Rule #63

Prev by Message: Re: OT: Can't believe I found this in the Wall Street Journal
Next by Message: Decline fire inspection?
Previous by thread: Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
Next by thread: Re: Off Topic - But Heinous
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home