[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: What's the fate of Concord and NetworX



On Nov 20, 8:45=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 3:12=A0pm, Effenpig1 <dirtyspicev...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 7:28=A0am, "ABLE1" <royboynos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > Any ideas on what will become of these two panels?
>
> > > Rather than trying to speculate what is or will be in the mind of som=
e top
> > > level corporate decision maker, which will be impossible at best. =A0=
Post your
> > > desire of what
>
> > I already know what I "want. I was hoping that someone on the forum
> > might have some knowledge about what we're going to "get".
>
> Since the deal is barely done nobody will know that information

I seriously doubt UT doesn't already have a game plan coming into this
purchase, somebody knows something.....

I don't pretend to know whats actually involved in designing a "new''
panel. I just thought it might be possible to incorporate some of the
better feature of one panel into the other. Maybe make the Concord
programming a little more flexible, or a variation of the networx with
a built in wireless receiver.


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home