Re: cameras/security

[G. Morgan <usenet_abuse@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bob Worthy wrote:

>. It was when a young girl was
>abducted at a car wash and murdered. It was the watermarking on the video
>that squashed that part of the defense's case. If the video would not have
>been watermarked who knows how the court would have looked at it and that
>video was a huge part of the prosecutor's case.

But was there even a question if it was authentic?  I mean, let's get real for
a second.  Someone would have to go through a lot of trouble to actually
"fake" a surveillance video.  On the other hand, I can see where it would help
investigators and prosecutors to know definitively if the time/date stamp was
100% accurate (in conjunction with the DVR logs).