Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41

["RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_usa@/nospam/hotmail.com>]

I'd check thatr wording again  Doug,  it seem to say to me  Non active
members of the industry, then the others  are recommeded by the KBFAA ie..
NBFAA   non members of the KBFAA  have no chance of membership on the
board..

(less your over 60 and the governor  likes you..   LOL)


"Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wraEj.72253$497.69777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> "tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:55f53a16-5e23-4ec2-a402-0e58d471da83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >
> > I don't know the nature of these new regulatory restrictions, so I
> > can't say this will happen for sure, but is just seems like another in
> > a long list of actions taken by governments to improve things, but
> > which more often than not, turn out to have just the opposite effect.
> >
> > I guess we'll just have to wait and see......
> >
>
> I found this document, which states its an  unofficial
> copy.http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/08RS/HB41/bill.doc
>
> I'm not sure how the requirement to contact every customer every 30 days
to
> verify the call list will work out in the real world, and as usual
licensed
> electricians are exempt as are mechanical & HVAC contractors for some
> reason.
>
> It seems a little ambiguous on DIY, it states that individual property
> owners personally installing an alarm system within the owners residence
or
> other building not open to the general public are exempt, which would seem
> to prevent any business that either rents its space or is open to the
public
> from installing their own alarm, for that matter it would seem to exclude
> any renter from installing an alarm in an apartment or home they rent.
>
> You would think that with 5 of the 9 members of the board required to  be
> alarm contractors that it would be somewhat sympathetic to the industry,
I'm
> not sure why one member has to be at least 60 years old though.
>
>
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>