Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41

["Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

 >I'm not sure why one member has to be at least 60 years old though.
It's the Whisky. If he's a drunk he should be dead from a bad liver or
something by then. Maybe they need at least one sober individual.

"Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wraEj.72253$497.69777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> "tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:55f53a16-5e23-4ec2-a402-0e58d471da83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >
> > I don't know the nature of these new regulatory restrictions, so I
> > can't say this will happen for sure, but is just seems like another in
> > a long list of actions taken by governments to improve things, but
> > which more often than not, turn out to have just the opposite effect.
> >
> > I guess we'll just have to wait and see......
> >
>
> I found this document, which states its an  unofficial
> copy.http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/08RS/HB41/bill.doc
>
> I'm not sure how the requirement to contact every customer every 30 days
to
> verify the call list will work out in the real world, and as usual
licensed
> electricians are exempt as are mechanical & HVAC contractors for some
> reason.
>
> It seems a little ambiguous on DIY, it states that individual property
> owners personally installing an alarm system within the owners residence
or
> other building not open to the general public are exempt, which would seem
> to prevent any business that either rents its space or is open to the
public
> from installing their own alarm, for that matter it would seem to exclude
> any renter from installing an alarm in an apartment or home they rent.
>
> You would think that with 5 of the 9 members of the board required to  be
> alarm contractors that it would be somewhat sympathetic to the industry,
I'm
> not sure why one member has to be at least 60 years old though.
>
>
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>