Re: What's a Brinks 4000?

["Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It is not a Texas Court. It is a Federal Court located in Texas. What you
have to say about the case may be true, nevertheless Jim is not out of gas
just yet. But if he doesn't show up, he won't have to worry about Brinks
anymore. It will be the judge and the Federal Court on his ass. Not my
favorite spot to be in that's for sure.

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ed92b6d16fd0a2136da8ef8fa1504e71@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >It would really help if Crash would send you the original.  Sableman's
> >way to sharp to let you submit a printout from a file sharing website.
> >Heck...  if you could get your mitts on a blank form, you'd blow him out
> >of the water.
>
> You guys don't understand.  The facts of this case no longer matter.  When
> Jim failed to file a timely answer to the lawsuit, and was unable to
> convince the judge to allow him to file late, all of the factual
> allegations in Brinks' complaint automatically became true:  Jim is
> considered to have admitted them.  Brink's no longer has to prove them.
>
> Jim is left with a technical legal argument: that a Texas court shouldn't
> have the authority to enter a judgment against him.  He needs a lawyer to
> make that argument for him.
>