Re: What's a Brinks 4000?

[Nomen Nescio <nobody@xxxxxxxxx>]

>It would really help if Crash would send you the original.  Sableman's
>way to sharp to let you submit a printout from a file sharing website.
>Heck...  if you could get your mitts on a blank form, you'd blow him out
>of the water.

You guys don't understand.  The facts of this case no longer matter.  When
Jim failed to file a timely answer to the lawsuit, and was unable to
convince the judge to allow him to file late, all of the factual
allegations in Brinks' complaint automatically became true:  Jim is
considered to have admitted them.  Brink's no longer has to prove them.

Jim is left with a technical legal argument: that a Texas court shouldn't
have the authority to enter a judgment against him.  He needs a lawyer to
make that argument for him.