Re: An email from yoursecuritysource.com's hosting provider

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Google Brink's:

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/brinks.html
read Cindy's complaint and their offer for her to buy out the system at
500.00

http://www.complaints.com/may2002/complaintoftheday.may15.30.htm

http://www.complaints.com/directory/2004/september/30/14.htm



--
Crash Gordon
-------ouch------

<I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe>
"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:471e2432$0$5008$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Is a merely a lock out code a trade secret? If so, is this a trade secret
| one that one dealer could take legal action against another dealer for
| revealing? What legal precedence does this ruling follow? I don't know
about
| anyone else, but I have let me say "seen" a sheet of lock out codes from
| nearly every other dealer in the trade area. I never even looked to see if
| Brinks is on there since I wouldn't do anything other than toss the panel
if
| Brinks refused to take it back. ADT won't take their panels back, because
it
| is some sort of Sarbanes-Oxley thing with them. The information on the
sheet
| is not something that is used to attack another dealer, but more of a
| convenience when a customer wants to change service. So what if I post a
set
| of random codes and call them Brinks lock out codes? What if by luck of
the
| draw I pick the same lock out code for my panels as their panels? I can't
| use that code? In my opinion all this is mighty feeble thinking on
someone's
| part.
|
| "Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:cfcd23d1e07a3a35d8980be7bd52bb56@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| > >One thing he's not posted is the Injunction and perhaps the wording in
| tha=
| > t=20
| > >is what prohibits him from posting the links to the AlarmsBC website as
| we=
| > ll.
| >
| > Here is the relevant part of the judge's order.  It started out as a
| > temporary restraining order, and was later converted to a preliminary
| > injunction.
|
 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| -=
| >
| > -----
| >
| > ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
| > Defendant Jim Rojas, and his agents, servants, and employees, and all
| > parties in active concert or participation with him (including all
parties
| > providing him with internet access), are hereby enjoined and restrained
| > from publishing, publicizing, distributing, or disseminating Brink=92s
| trad=
| > e
| > secrets, such as the lockout codes on Brink=92s control panels; the
| softwar=
| > e,
| > methods and/or codes by which the Brink=92s programmer works; methods of
| > resetting, erasing, or changing lockout codes on Brink=92s control
panels;
| > any other methods of circumventing the lockout codes on Brink=92s
control
| > panels; or the content of Brink=92s installation or programming manuals,
| > instructions, methods and/or procedures.
| >
|
|